USPTO serial 73759807
GALVSTEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GALVSTEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GLENBROOK, SOUTH AUCKLAND, NZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL SOLD IN SHEETS, COILS, STRIPS AND BARS, AND METAL BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, ROOFING, WALL CLADDING, GUTTERS, DOWN PIPES AND PANELS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |