USPTO serial 73759828
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS, MAGNETIC AND OPTICAL DATA DISCS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS RECORDED ON SUCH DISCS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES, CUSTOM DESIGN OF COMPUTER HARDWARE & SOFTWARE SYSTEMS AND PERFORMANCE OF TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE AREA OF CUSTOM DESIGN OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |