USPTO serial 73760198
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | RADIO AND TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | THE OPERATION OF AN ENTERPRISE OFFERING RADIO AND TELEVISION PRODUCTION SERVICES, ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY TELEVISION PROGRAMMING AND VIDEOGRAM PRODUCTION SERVICES AND INDUSTRIAL VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |