CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TITE LINER

USPTO serial 73761337

TITE LINER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1768304Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 27, 1993
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TITE LINER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL I. WOLFSON

MICHAEL I WOLFSON GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017NON-METAL PIPE LINERS AND FITTINGS FOR PIPE LINERS USED TO TRANSPORT CORROSIVE OR ABRASIVE FLUIDS OR SLURRIESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 13, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 15, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 16, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 26, 200389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Apr 24, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Apr 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 19998.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Feb 17, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 27, 1993R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 14, 1993CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jan 11, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 7, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 6, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1990REINREINSTATED—
Apr 20, 1990ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 20, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance