USPTO serial 73761583
THE MONEY MAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE MONEY MAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ST-EUSTACHE, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LYNNE DARCY
LYNNE DARCY DEROSA, VANDENBERG & COLEMAN71 BROADWAYSTE 2200NEW YORK, NY 10006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME WATER, TOILET WATER, COLOGNE WATER, COLOGNE, FRAGRANCES, HAIR SHAMPOOS, RINSE CREAM, HAIR CARE TREATMENTS, CONDITIONNERS, HAIR COLORS, PERMANENTE WAVE LOTIONS, HAIR BLEACH, SPARAY NETS, GELS, HAIR FOAMS, BEFORE AND AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS, SHAVING CREAMS, DEODORANTS, FACIAL CLEANSERS, MOISTURIZING CREAMS, SOAPS, LIPSTICKS, EYE SHADOWS, MASCARAS, EYELINER PENCILS, BLUSHES, MAKEUP FOUNDATIONS, MAKEUP FOUNDATIONS, MAKEUP REMOVERS, MOISTURIZING LOTIONS, MOISTURIZING MILKS, CLEANSING MILKS, REFRESHING LOTIONS, CLEANSING CREAMS, DAY CREAMS, NIGHT CREAMS, ANTI-WRINKLES CREAMS, ANTI-STRETCH MARK CREAMS, ANTI-CELLULITIS CREAMS, HAND CREAS, BATH OIL, BUBBLE BATH, NAIL REMOVERS, NAIL POLISHES, NAIL STRENGTHENER, ENAMEL DRYER, CUTICULES CONDITIONNING CREAMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |