Drawing for DARIO DI NAPOLI

USPTO serial 73762670

DARIO DI NAPOLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1568484Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 1989
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DARIO DI NAPOLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Billy A. Robbins

Billy A. Robbins CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPSuite 2300333 South Grand AvenueLOS ANGELES, CA 90071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025SUITS, SPORT COATS, TOPCOATS, AND SLACKSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDOct 14, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2010C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Jun 18, 2010C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Jun 18, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 18, 2010ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED
Dec 15, 2009RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 15, 200989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 30, 2009E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Sep 6, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2001C.7CNEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Jun 20, 2000PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9
Nov 19, 199989AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
Jun 7, 1996C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 24, 1995815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 28, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 9, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 6, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1989ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 13, 1989CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 19, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance