USPTO serial 73762980
CASSETTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MELTZER, ELEANOR
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASSETTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | BEDDING, NAMELY PILLOWS (NOT FOR SURGICAL OR CURATIVE PURPOSES) STUFFED WITH FEATHERS, HALF DOWN, DOWN, OR OTHER KINDS OF STUFFING MATERIALS, INCLUDING ALSO SYNTHETIC STUFFING MATERIALS, SLEEPING BAGS, MATTRESSES, TOP MATTRESSES, AND FEATHERBEDS IN THE NATURE OF MATTRESSES. | ABANDONED | — |
| 022 | DOWN, FEATHERS, AND SYNTHETIC STUFFING MATERIALS FOR EIDERDOWNS, COMFORTERS, QUILTS, PILLOWS, AND SLEEPING BAGS | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | TEXTILES AND TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, BED LINENS, BED AND TABLE COVERS, EIDERDOWNS, COMFORTERS, AND QUILTS STUFFED WITH FEATHERS HALF DOWN, DOWN OR OTHER KINDS OF STUFFING MATERIALS, INCLUDING ALSO SYNTHETIC STUFFING MATERIALS, INSULATING FABRIC AND INTERLINING USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 5, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |