USPTO serial 73763432
EPIMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPIMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HANDTOOLS AND CUTLERY, NAMELY KNIVES, FORKS, AND SPOONS; SWORDS, ELECTRIC DEPILATORY HAIR REMOVERS; ELECTRIC AND NON-ELECTRIC RAZORS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |