USPTO serial 73763869
POSEIDON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSEIDON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
POSEIDON KOMPRESSOREN GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
WR. NEUDORF, NIEDEROSTERREICH, AT
Other trademarks owned by POSEIDON KOMPRESSOREN GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MEDIUM AND HIGH PRESSURE COMPRESSORS FOR COMPRESSING GASEOUS MEDIA, FILTERING UNITS FOR USE WITH COMPRESSORS, HIGH PRESSURE BREATHING AIR COMPRESSORS FOR FILLING AIR BREATHING CYLINDERS FOR DIVING USE AND BREATHING PROTECTION; AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 28, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |