USPTO serial 73764303
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B. HARRISON
MARK B HARRISON SPENCER & FRANK1111 NINETEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, MONEY MANAGEMENT, INVESTMENT ANALYSIS, FUND MANAGEMENT, SECURITIES ANALYSIS, CREDIT ANALYSIS, PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, AND BANKING, AND PROGRAM MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | Nov 7, 1988 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 18, 1990 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 15, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |