Drawing for CD/INVESTMENT

USPTO serial 73764303

CD/INVESTMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ERSKINE KATHRYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CD/INVESTMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B. HARRISON

MARK B HARRISON SPENCER & FRANK1111 NINETEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, MONEY MANAGEMENT, INVESTMENT ANALYSIS, FUND MANAGEMENT, SECURITIES ANALYSIS, CREDIT ANALYSIS, PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, AND BANKING, AND PROGRAM MANUALS SOLD AS A UNITABANDONEDNov 7, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 7, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 7, 1990EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 18, 1990CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
May 18, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 15, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 18, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 13, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance