USPTO serial 73764535
ORKEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORKEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARIS LA DEFENSE, FR
PARIS LA DEFENSE, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | FULL LINE OF INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS | ABANDONED | — |
| 002 | FULL LINE OF INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL DYES, VARNISHES, LACQUERS, PAINTS, STAINS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, WALL SIZINGS, SHEET METAL AND POWDERED METAL FOR ARTISTS' SUPPLIES AND PRINTERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | MOBILE HOMES | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | FULL LINE OF SYNTHETIC AND NATURAL RUBBER, ASBESTOS, MICA, SEMI-FINISHED PLASTICS; CAULKING, PACKING, AND INSULATING MATERIALS; AND NON-METALLIC HOSES, ALL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; NAMELY, STONES, CEMENT; LIME, MORTAR, PLASTER, AND GRAVEL; TILE AND CEMENT PIPES; ROAD CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, NAMELY ASPHALT, PITCH, AND BITUMEN; BITUMEN-TAR MIXTURES AS BINDERS FOR ROAD MAINTENANCE; GYPSUM, COAL TAR, AND BITUMENOUS EMULSIONS FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION; COATINGS OF BITUMEN-TAR-POLYMER MIXTURES FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; ROOFING FELT; STONE AND NON-METALLIC MONUMENTS; AND CHIMNEYS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORKEM S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ORKEM S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named ORKEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |