USPTO serial 73764783
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SF-02200 ESPOO, FI
SF-02200 ESPOO, FI
SF-02200 ESPOO, FI
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | FULL LINE OF PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES AND DIETETIC PREPARATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 31, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |