USPTO serial 73765743
INTERGLASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1715079Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 1992
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERGLASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BISHOP AUKLAND, CO. DURHAM, DL14 9T, GB
BISHOP AUKLAND, CO. DURHAM, DL14 9T, GB
BISHOP AUKLAND, CO. DURHAM, DL14 9T, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY M. FINKELSTEIN
JAY M FINKELSTEIN SPENSLEY HORN JUBAS & LUBITZSTE 5001880 CENTURY PARK ELOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GLASS COOKER CONTROL PANELS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1981 |
| 011 | GLASS HOB TOPS FOR COOKERS AND GLASS OVEN DOORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 1982 |
| 012 | GLASS SUNROOFS FOR AUTOMOBILES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1984 |
| 019 | GLASS FOR SHOWER SCREENS AND SHOWER ENCLOSURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERGLASS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by INTERGLASS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by INTERGLASS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named INTERGLASS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 1992 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 12, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |