USPTO serial 73765895
CHOCONUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, RON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHOCONUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KAMBLY AG, BISCUITSFABRIK (KAMBLY S.A., FABRIQUE DE BISCUITS)
TRUBSCHACHEN, CH
Other trademarks owned by KAMBLY AG, BISCUITSFABRIK (KAMBLY S.A., FABRIQUE DE BISCUITS)
KAMBLY AG, BISCUITSFABRIK (KAMBLY S.A., FABRIQUE DE BISCUITS)
TRUBSCHACHEN, CH
Other trademarks owned by KAMBLY AG, BISCUITSFABRIK (KAMBLY S.A., FABRIQUE DE BISCUITS)
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BAKERY PRODUCTS CONTAINING CHOCOLATE AND NUTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KAMBLY AG, BISCUITSFABRIK (KAMBLY S.A., FABRIQUE DE BISCUITS)
- Other trademarks owned by KAMBLY AG, BISCUITSFABRIK (KAMBLY S.A., FABRIQUE DE BISCUITS)
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHOCONUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |