USPTO serial 73766904
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LOCKPORT, NY
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SHAMPOOS, EXTRACTS FOR THE HAIR, HAIR MASK, PERMANENTS, FIXATIVES; AND COSMETICS, NAMELY, PERFUMES, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, SKIN CREAMS, BATH SOAPS, SKIN CLEANSERS, SKIN MASKS, AND SKIN TONERS | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1988 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |