USPTO serial 73767142
INC INTEGRATED NETWORK CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INC INTEGRATED NETWORK CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTS, NAMELY; DATA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, COMPRISING DIGITAL MULTIPLEXERS, DATA INTERFACE PLUG-IN UNITS, SWITCHING INTERFACE COMPUTER PROGRAMS, CIRCUIT MAINTENANCE COMPUTER PROGRAMS, CIRCUIT MAINTENANCE COMPUTER PROGRAMS, DIGITAL CARRIERS AND REGENERATORS; TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS COMPRISING INTER-OFFICE AND LOOP CARRIER DIGITAL CHANNEL BANKS, CHANNEL INTERFACE PLUG-IN UNITS, COMMON PLUG-IN UNITS, MULTIPLEXERS, FACILITY TERMINALS AND INTELLIGENT ADJUNCTS TO EXISTING CHANNEL BANKS; AND CUSTOMER PREMISES EQUIPMENT NAMELY; DATA SERVICE UNITS, SIMULTANEOUS VOICE/DATA UNITS, DATA TERMINALS, NETWORK CHANNEL TERMINATING UNITS, NETWORK INTERFACE UNITS, AND CUSTOMER DATA MULTIPLEXERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |