USPTO serial 73767232
HOMETOWN AUTO CREDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZMAN, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOMETOWN AUTO CREDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCING AND CREDIT SERVICES FOR THE PURCHASE OF AUTOMOBILES | ABANDONED | May 6, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 1990 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |