USPTO serial 73768196
VERSAGAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERSAGAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HITCHIN, HERTFORDSHIRE SG4 OTS, GB
HITCHIN, HERTFORDSHIRE SG4 OTS, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MEASURING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY GAUGES AND PARTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |