USPTO serial 73768276
KITTYMATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KITTYMATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. MCKEE
JAMES W MCKEE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVESTE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | COASTERS, DOORMATS, FLOOR MATS, RUGS, WALL HANGINGS, RAGS, TOWELS, FACE CLOTHS, PILLOW SLIPS, BED SHEETS, DISH CLOTHS, TOILET SEAT COVERS, FLAGS, PLACEMATS, NAPKINS, OVEN MITTS, SERVIETTES AND PENNANTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | LAWN ORNAMENTS, SEASONAL CHRISTMAS AND EASTER DECORATIONS; NEEDLEPOINT KITS AND PATTERNS, JIGSAW PUZZLES; FOOTBALLS; BALLONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |