Drawing for NOLAN MILLER

USPTO serial 73768287

NOLAN MILLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LE, MARGARET
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOLAN MILLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARILYN BROGAN

MARILYN BROGAN CURTIS, MORRIS & SAFFORD, PC530 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY DRESSES, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, PANTS, SHIRTS, JACKETS, SWEATERS, SUITS, SHORTS, COATS, AND EVENING GOWNSABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 14, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 12, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 4, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 4, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 18, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 30, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 14, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance