USPTO serial 73775517
AMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, JEFFREY R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V.M. CREEDON
V M CREEDON WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACKSOUTHERN BLDG STE 700805 FIFTEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTING FIBREBOARD FOR USE AS PACKAGING MATERIALS | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | NITRILE-BONDED AND ARAMID FIBRE-REINFORCED PACKING AND SEALING MATERIALS, ESPECIALLY FOR USE IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND RESIDENTIAL STEAM PRESSURE SYSTEMS, SUCH AS BOILERS, VALVES AND FLANGES; AND FOR USE AS SEALING MATERIAL INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND RESIDENTIAL HOT AND COLD WATER SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | FIBRE-REINFORCED BOARD FOR USE IN CONSTRUCTION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |