USPTO serial 73776414
STELLARNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STELLARNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID E. BARTLETT, ESQ.
DAVID E BARTLETT ESQ COOLEY, GODWARD, CASTRO, ET ALFIVE PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PERSONAL COMPUTER APPLICATIONS COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND RELATED WRITTEN INSTRUCTION MATERIALS WHICH FACILITATE THE USE OF A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SYSTEM FOR THE EDITING, BUNDLING AND TRANSFER OF INFORMATION USED IN BOOKKEEPING, BILLING, CLAIMS MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHL CARE DATA BASE COMPILATION, MANIPULATION, TRANSMISSION AND COMMUNICATION BY AND AMONG PHYSICIANS, HEALTH CARE CLINICS, HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS, INSURANCE COMPANIES, WORKERS' COMPENSATION AGENCIES AND INSURES, AND EMPLOYERS WHO SELF-INSURE AND TRACK EMPLOYEE CLAIMS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS | ABANDONED | Nov 16, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |