USPTO serial 73777008
MOMENTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOMENTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN M. GERBER
STEVEN M GERBER500 SEVENTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | CAMPING BAGS | ABANDONED | Dec 14, 1988 |
| 018 | NAMELY UMBRELLAS, WALLETS, TRAVEL BAGS, TOTE BAGS, KNAPSACKS, CAMPING BAGS OR DUFFLE BAGS, SCHOOL BAGS, HANDBAGS, GYM BAGS, AND BRIEFCASES, ALL MADE OF NYLON, COTTON, LEATHER, DENIM OR CANVAS | ABANDONED | Dec 14, 1988 |
| 025 | LS, SWIMSUITS, SOCKS AND UNDERWEAR: AND WOMEN'S AND GIRLS' BLOUSES, SKIRTS, DRESSES, HOSIERY, PANTY HOSE, TIGHTS, STOCKINGS, UNDERWEAR BRIEFS AND TOPS, BRAS AND PANTIES, HATS SCARVES, GLOVES, AND FOOTWEAR | ABANDONED | Jan 17, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 7, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 29, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |