USPTO serial 73777665
EZ CLAIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZ CLAIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEAL W. ROSENBERG
JEFFREY D CHANSLER EMPIRE BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELDONE WORLD TRADE CTRNEW YORK, NY 10048-0682UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE PROGRAM TO ELECTRICALLY SUBMIT HEALTH CLAIMS AND FACILITATE BILLING PRACTICES AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |