USPTO serial 73780100
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SANTA CLARA, CA
SANTA CLARA, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NINA F. LOCKER
NINA F LOCKER WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATITWO PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NETWORK FACSIMILE SERVERS | ABANDONED | Feb 2, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |