USPTO serial 73780756
MASTER PAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 1991
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MASTER PAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THOMAS & BETTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SPARKS, NV
Other trademarks owned by THOMAS & BETTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
OAKVILLE, ONT.L6K 3W5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL L HOELTER
MICHAEL L HOELTER THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION8155 T & B BLVD 4B-36MEMPHIS, TN 38125UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INSULATING ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 2, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMAS & BETTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MARR ELECTRIC LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MARR ELECTRIC LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MARR ELECTRIC LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MARR GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MASTER PAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |