USPTO serial 73780971
THE APARTMENT INN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 1990
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE APARTMENT INN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ATLANTA, GA
NORCROSS, GA
ATLANTA, GA
ATLANTA, GA
ATLANTA, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VINCENT L. RAMIK
VINCENT L RAMIK DILLER, RAMIK & WIGHT, PCSTE 101, MERRION SQ7345 MCWHORTER PLANNANDALE, VA 22003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | RENTAL OF APARTMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 21, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAKER, JOHN
- Other trademarks owned by BAKER, JOHN
- Other trademarks owned by BAKER, ELENA
- Other trademarks owned by BAKER, ELENA
- Other trademarks owned by BAKER, JOHN
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named THE APARTMENT INN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 16, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 18, 1996 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1990 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 16, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |