USPTO serial 73783860
M MADELEINE VIONNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BYERS, KRISTEN S.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M MADELEINE VIONNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM P. HERKLOTS
WILLIAM P HERKLOTS BRYLAWSKI, CLEARY & LEEDS801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S ESTE 201WASHINGTON, DC 20003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME, PERFUME OIL, EYE SHADOW, EYEBROW PENCIL, MASCARA, GENERAL TOILET WATER, FACE POWDER, LIQUID POWDER, EMULSION, MEDICATED TOILET WATER, SKIN LOTION, TOILET CREAM, EAU-DE-COLOGNE, VANISHING CREAM, COLD CREAM, CLEANSING CREAM, MEDICATED CREAM, FOUNDATION CREAM, LIP STICK, FACE ROUGE, POMADE, TIQUE, HAIR OIL, HAIR TONIC, HAIR DYES, HAIR CREAM, PERMANENT SOLUTION, COLD WAVING SOLUTION, POWDERED PERFUME, ENAMEL FOR MANICURE, BAY-RUM, DEPILATORY, HAIR-SPRAY, HAIR DECOLORANT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |