USPTO serial 73786653
SUSCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUSCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY C. DALTON
STANLEY C DALTON WOOD, DALTON, PHILLIPS, MASON & ROWENORTHWESTERN ATRIUM CTR500 W MADISON ST STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | HYDRAULIC PUMPS, HYDRAULIC MOTORS, HYDRAULIC TRANSMISSIONS CONSISTING OF A HYDRAULIC PUMP AND A HYDRAULIC MOTOR, CONTROLS THEREFOR, PARTS THEREOF AND GEARBOXES FOR USE WITH HYDRAULIC TRANSMISSIONS | ABANDONED | Nov 20, 1988 |
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLS INCLUDING ELECTROHYDRAULIC TRANSDUCERS AND ELECTRICAL SENSORS AND PARTS THEREOF FOR CONTROL OF HYDRAULIC TRANSMISSIONS, OF HYDRAULIC POWER SYSTEMS FOR STATIONARY USE, AND OF OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | Nov 20, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |