USPTO serial 73790815
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIRGIL H. MARSH
VIRGIL H MARSH FISHER, CHRISTEN & SABOLSTE 5902000 M ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SPECTACLES, GLASS, SUNGLASSES AND SPECTACLE CASES | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | BRACELETS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL AND RINGS | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | FOUNTAIN PENS AND PENCILS | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | FURNITURE, CHAIRS, ARM CHAIRS, TABLES, AND CUPBOARDS | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | TOWELS, TEXTILE NAPKINS, AND BED SPREADS | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | WINE AND ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, WHISKY, GIN AND CHAMPAGNE | ABANDONED | — |
| 034 | CIGARETTE LIGHTERS (NOT FOR AUTOMOBILES), CIGARETTE HOLDERS AND CIGARETTE CASES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |