USPTO serial 73791549
VARI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1939066Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 1995
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VARI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ONTARIO, CA
GORMELY, ONTARIO, CA
ONTARIO, CA
THORNHILL ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WELDON F. GREEN
WELDON F GREEN WELDON F GREEN & COBOX 151275 KING ST ETORONTO, ON M5A 1K2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LTD.,
- Other trademarks owned by RISI STONE LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LTD.,
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named VARI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |