USPTO serial 73794132
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
KIRKLAND, WA
SOFTWARE ACQUISITION CORP. INC.
GLENDALE, CA
GLENDALE, CA
SOFTWARE ACQUISITION CORP. INC.
GLENDALE, CA
GLENDALE, CA
GLENDALE, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KISONG KIM LANG-CADITZ
KISONG KIM LANG-CADITZ CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVESTE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, EQUIPMENT, AND SUPPLIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 17, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 1996 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1994 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |