USPTO serial 73798330
TOPRUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOPRUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER SOLD IN BULK; ANIMAL SKINS AND HIDES; POLYVINYL-CHLORIDE LEATHER SOLD IN BULK; AND SYNTHETIC AND ARTIFICIAL LEATHER SOLD IN BULK | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | POLYVINYL-CHLORIDE SHEET SOLD IN BULK; AND WOVEN FABRICS WITH AND WITHOUT ADDITIONAL POLYVINYL-CHLORIDE AND OTHER BACKING TREATMENTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF BAGS, HANDBAGS AND LUGGAGE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |