USPTO serial 73800131
ZERO POINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1781489Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 1993
- Examiner
- LUPO, ANTHONY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZERO POINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MOUNTAIN-CLIMBING WEAR; NAMELY, ONE-PIECE EXPEDITION SUITS; CHLORO-FIBER INSULATED UNDERWEAR FOR MOUNTAIN CLIMBING; TURTLENECK SHIRTS, TEE SHIRTS, MEN'S AND WOMEN'S TIGHTS, BALACLAVAS, JUNIOR SHIRTS AND TIGHTS, INNER GLOVES AND INNER SOCKS; CONSTRUCTION VESTS; TRAINING TOPS AND PANTS; SLEEVELESS SHIRTS AND TEE SHIRTS MADE OF QUICK DRY FABRIC AND IMPRINTED WITH DESIGNS RELATED TO MOUNTAIN CLIMBING; INSULATED TWO-PIECE SUITS AND SEPERATE PANTS AND PULLOVERS USED BY MOUNTAIN CLIMBERS; WATERPROOF LIGHTWEIGHT INSULATED PANTS AND JACKETS; SNOW RESISTANT INSULATED PANTS AND JACKETS; ALL SOLD IN SPORTING GOOD AND GYMNASTIC STORES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA MONT-BELL
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA MONT-BELL
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA MONT-BELL
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ZERO POINT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1990 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |