USPTO serial 73801268
FABWEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FABWEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | ALUMINUM, NAMELY SHEET ALUMINUM, COIL ALUMINUM, FABRICATED ALUMINUM; STEEL NAMELY, SHEET STEEL, COIL STEEL, FABRICATED STEEL; RAIN CARRYING PRODUCTS AND ACCESSORIES OF METAL NAMELY, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, ELBOWS, FACIA, SOFFITS, GUTTER SPIKES, GUTTER GUARDS, SPLASH BLOCKS; FLASHINGS, ROOF EDGING, SIDING, END CAPS, SPIKES, FERRULES, HANGERS, MITER STRIPS, MITER CORNERS, AND LEAF GUARDS | ABANDONED | Aug 13, 1986 |
| 012 | VEHICLE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, TREAD PLATES, RUNNING BOARDS, STEP PLATES, TAILGATE GUARDS, SIDE RAILS, BUG GUARDS, MUD GUARDS, HEADLIGHT COVERS, BUG SCREENS, LICENSE PLATE COVERS, RADIATOR COVERS, TRUCK TOP RAILS, WOODEN DASHBOARDS, HOOD PROTECTORS, VISORS, LIGHT BRIDGES, TRUCK CAB EXTENDERS | ABANDONED | Aug 13, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 23, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1989 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |