USPTO serial 73802741
TARMAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1661739Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 1991
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TARMAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Norfolk, VA
TAMPA, FL
TAMPA, FL
TAMPA, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL GRANDINETTE
PAUL GRANDINETTI LEVY & GRANDINETTIP O BOX 14011725 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | CEMENT, READY MIXED CONCRETE, CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE BLOCKS, PRE-CAST CONCRETE, AND CONCRETE BRICKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tramac America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TARMAC ROADSTONE (USA), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TARMAC ROADSTONE (USA), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TARMAC ROADSTONE (USA), INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named TARMAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |