Drawing for HYBRID SERVER

USPTO serial 73810189

HYBRID SERVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYBRID SERVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HAROLD E. MEIER

HAROLD E MEIER GARDERE & WYNNETHANKSGIVING TWR1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MICROCOMPUTER BASED BOARD AND SYSTEM LEVEL APPLICATION HARDWARE - NAMELY, A CPU, PERIPHERAL CONTROL CARDS AND A REAL TIME OPERATING UNIT; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL, SCIENTIFIC AND MILITARY REAL TIME APPLICATIONSABANDONEDOct 3, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 3, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 15, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 28, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 9, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance