USPTO serial 73812517
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRED A. WILSON
FRED A WILSON HYDROCARBON RESEARCH INCP O BOX 6047LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RENDERING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN CONNECTION WITH THE LICENSING, DESIGN AND/OR OPERATION OF PLANTS FOR COAL HYDROGENATION AND LIQUEFACTION, PETROLEUM REFINING, CHEMICAL AND PETROLEUM PROCESSING | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | CONSTRUCTING PLANTS FOR THE COAL LIQUEFACTION, PETROLEUM REFINING, AND PETROCHEMICAL PROCESSING INDUSTRIES | ABANDONED | Sep 8, 1985 |
| 042 | ENGINEERING RESEARCH, DESIGN, AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE COAL LIQUEFACTION, PETROLEUM REFINING AND PETROCHEMICAL PROCESSING FIELDS | ABANDONED | Sep 8, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |