USPTO serial 73818879
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VAUGHN W. NORTH
VAUGHN W NORTH THORPE N & WESTERN9035 S STATESTE 300SANDY, UT 84070-2418| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jun 20, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 19, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |