USPTO serial 73825589
AUTO-SHADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTO-SHADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY SUNSCREENS, CLIPS FOR SUNSCREENS AND WEATHERSHIELDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |