USPTO serial 73829401
EYEZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYEZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. HARRIS
RICHARD C HARRIS STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER515 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 1427ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL GOODS; NAMELY, SPECTACLES, SPECTACLE FRAMES, SPECTACLE CASES, CONTACT LENSES, CONTAINERS FOR CONTACT LENSES, EYEGLASS LENSES, OPTICAL AND CORRECTIVE LENSES FOR USE IN EYEWEAR, SIGHTING TELESCOPES FOR FIREARMS, SUNGLASSES, GOGGLES FOR AVIATORS AND MOTORCYCLISTS, COMPUTER GLASSES AND SAFETY GOGGLES FOR USE IN WELDING | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | SPORT GLASSES, SKI GOGGLES AND DIVING GOGGLES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ETABLISSEMENTS BOLLE, GEORGES, ROBERT ET MAURICE
- Other trademarks owned by ETABLISSEMENTS BOLLE, GEORGES, ROBERT ET MAURICE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named EYEZONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |