Drawing for PRIDE MAKES THE DIFFERENCE

USPTO serial 73830691

PRIDE MAKES THE DIFFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIDE MAKES THE DIFFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J.SCOTT CHASE

J SCOTT CHASE2400 ONE DOLLAR CTRDALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042HEALTH CARE SERVICES, NAMELY; HOSPITAL SERVICES; NURSING SERVICES; RESPIRATORY, PHYSICAL, SPEECH, AND LANGUAGE THERAPY; PHARMACEUTICAL, LABORATORY, AND SOCIAL SERVICES; AND COUNSELING AND CARDIAC REHABILITATION SERVICESABANDONEDMar 2, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 29, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 29, 1992EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 12, 1991CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jun 11, 1991CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Apr 13, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 28, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 28, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 13, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 18, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 1990UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance