Drawing for TAMPER SAFE

USPTO serial 73833921

TAMPER SAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAMPER SAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARNOLD B. SILVERMAN

ARNOLD B SILVERMAN ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN & MELLOTT600 GRANT ST FORTY-SECOND FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001TAMPER-RESISTANT MATERIAL FOR PHARMACEUTICAL, HEALTH, BEAUTY AND FOOD PRODUCTS' PACKAGING, NAMELY - A LIGHT CURABLE SYNTHETIC RESIOUS MATERIAL FOR APPLICATION TO THE ORIGINAL PACKAGINGABANDONEDAug 23, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 22, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 1, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 6, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance