USPTO serial 73838376
LA PREFERIDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 1992
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LA PREFERIDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin A. Thompson
Kevin A. Thompson Levin Ginsburg180 N. LaSalle, Suite 3200CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ FRESH, FROZEN, ] CANNED AND PRESERVED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; FRESH, DRY, CURED, AND CANNED MEATS; CHILI CON CARNE; BEEF TRIPE STEW; POTTED MEAT; [ BLOOD PUDDING AND SAUSAGE IN SAUCE; SALTED AND CURED PIGS FEET; FATBACK; ] BEANS WITH BACON; [ FRESH, FROZEN DRIED AND ] CANNED FISH AND SEAFOODS;, namely, [ SALMON, ] SARDINES, [ SHRIMP, ] [ CRAB MEAT, TUNA, ] [ OYSTERS, ] [ CODFISH, POLLOCK,] [ HERRING, RED SNAPPER, CUTTLEFISH, OCTOPUS, EELS, MUSSELS, COCKLES AND ANCHOVIES; ] LARD AND EDIBLE OILS; TABLE SYRUP; FRUIT PASTES; TOMATO PASTE; [ JELLIES AND MARMALADES; ] CHEESE, CHEESE DIPS, [ CONDENSED AND ] [ POWDERED MILK, ] STUFFED AND UNSTUFFED PEPPERS [ ; AND EDIBLE PROCESSED SEEDS ] | ACTIVE | Jun 29, 1949 |
| 030 | COFFEE; [ TEA; ] RICE; CRACKERS; BREAD AND BREADSTICKS; WHEAT, RICE AND CORN FLOUR; GROUND OATMEAL; [ CANDY; ] [ CONFECTIONS;, namely, ] [ TURRONES; CHOCOLATE; BREAKFAST CEREAL; ] [ CUSTARDS AND PUDDINGS; ] SPICES; PROCESSED HERBS; SEASONINGS;, namely, CHILI SEASONING, SALT, GARLIC GRANULES, MINCED ONIONS; [ AND ] CORN HUSKS IN WHICH FOODS ARE WRAPPED AND COOKED; SAUCES; FRESH [, FROZEN ] AND CANNED TAMALES, AND TORTILLAS [ ; AND RAVIOLI ] | ACTIVE | Jun 29, 1949 |
| 032 | [ FRESH, FROZEN AND CANNED FRUIT JUICES AND NECTARS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 1941 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LAPREFERIDA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LAPREFERIDA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LAPREFERIDA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named LA PREFERIDA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 4, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 4, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 1998 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |