USPTO serial 74000345
GLENEAGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 22, 1992
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLENEAGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN M. ROMMEL
JOHN M ROMMEL KENYON & KENYONSTE 6001025 CONNECTICUT AVE N EWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |