USPTO serial 74001347
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN D. REICHMAN
JONATHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | UMBRELLAS, TOTE BAGS, GYM BAGS AND WAIST POUCHES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |