USPTO serial 74001579
SOFTBANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1856178Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 1994
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOFTBANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD D. SEIBEL
RICHARD D SEIBEL CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALEP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN PERSONAL COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPACT DISCS CARRYING A FULL LINE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH PERSONAL COMPUTERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |