USPTO serial 74016203
QUINTESSENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUINTESSENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Anderson
BRAIN D ANDERSON OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER OPERATING SOFTWARE, COMPUTER UTILITY SOFTWARE, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE FOR BUSINESS APPLICATIONS SUCH AS WORD PROCESSING PROGRAMS, TELECOMMUNICATION PROGRAMS, SPREADSHEET PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 1992 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |