USPTO serial 74021192
SPICE ISLANDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPICE ISLANDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Bailey-Wells
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS LIMBACH, LIMBACH & SUTTON2001 FERRY BLDGSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | sauce mixes, namely Dry Gravy Mix, Taco sauce Mix, Spaghetti Sauce mix, Chili Sauce Mix, Teriyaki Sauce Mix and Sweet and Sour sauce Mix | ABANDONED | Apr 2, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 8, 1992 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1991 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |