USPTO serial 74021610
F. MILLOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with F. MILLOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred Wittenstein
FRED WITTENSTEIN WITTRICH LTD226 E 54TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume, cologne, toilet water, face cream, face powder, talcum powder, eau de toilette, rouge, lipstick, bath salts, toilet soap, shampoo, hair care preparations, brilliantine, bath and body preparations, skin creams, toners and lotions, sachets | ACTIVE | Jan 24, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2001 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |